Save Grassroots Radio

No, even though it may look that way because founders were involved in a disagreement.

Founder's syndrome occurs when an organization's founders are still in positions of leadership or management, and resist accepting and leading the changes necessary for the organization to mature, such as formal financial accounting, clear (and therefore less flexible and fun) roles and responsibilities, or sharing power and responsibility (reducing their control, but also enabling all of the now-increased work to get done).

The people whose memberships were revoked were not in formal leadership positions so don't qualify for the syndrome. Each of them also helped create and participate in systems necessary for organizational maturity.

Conflict at KRFC may be more closely related to community researcher Diana Leaf Christian's "structural conflict" than founder's syndrome:

problems that occurred because founders didn't explicitly put certain processes in place or make certain important decisions at the beginning, creating one or more omissions in their organizational structure. Several weeks, months, or even years later the group would erupt in major conflict that could have been largely prevented if they had handled these issues early on. Naturally, this sets off a great deal of interpersonal conflict too, making the initial "structural" conflict even worse. http://www.hopedance.org/new/issues/51/article4.html